Dedicated to the
Health and Welfare of All Cats
A A A
Font Size
hero-education

Cat Health News Blog

A resource for dedicated cat supporters

Since its start in 2007, Cat Health News has featured the latest information on feline health. The bi-weekly blog is a mix of the most current published research from Winn-funded research and other sources. There are over 875 blog post items and more than 1,000 subscribers through the RSS feed.


icon-blogWinn-funded research is specifically noted by the small green cat.

  • Screening tests for FeLV and FIV

    Jun 30, 2017
    Levy J, Crawford PC, Tucker SJ. Performance of 4 Point-of-Care Screening Tests for Feline Leukemia Virus and Feline Immunodeficiency Virus. J Vet Intern Med.  2017;31:521–526.

    Sitting catIdentification of cats infected with Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV) or Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) is critical to controlling these potentially lethal agents of disease. To this end, point of care ELISA kits are often used for screening for infection. As the authors state,” life or death decisions based on a single test result make the use of point-of-care screening tests a high-stakes event.” This investigation compared the performance of four such kits: SNAP® Combo FeLV Ag/FIV Ab Test3 (bidirectional flow ELISA), WITNESS® FeLV-FIV Test Kit4 (lateral flow immunochromatography with colloidal gold), Anigen® Rapid FIV Ab/FeLV Ag Test Kit5 (lateral flow immunochromatography with colloidal gold), and VetScan® Feline FeLV/FIV Rapid Test6 (lateral flow immunochromatography with colloidal gold). 

    146 FeLV+, 154 FeLV−, 94 FIV+, and 97 FIV− samples were tested using these kits. 

    Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for FeLV were SNAP® (100%/100%), WITNESS®(89.0%/95.5%), Anigen® (91.8%/95.5%), and VetScan® (85.6%/85.7%).

    Sensitivity and specificity for FIV were SNAP® (97.9%/99.0%), WITNESS® (94.7%/100%), Anigen® (96.8%/99.0%), and VetScan®(91.5%/99.0%).

    The SNAP® test had the best performance for FeLV, but there were no significant differences for FIV. In typical cat populations with seroprevalence of 1–5%, a majority of positive results reported by most point-of-care test devices would be false-positives. This could result in unnecessary segregation or even euthanasia. As the authors state: “Positive test results, especially for cats in low-risk categories, should be confirmed with alternative testing modalities, such as a different type of point-of-care test, PCR, or, in the case of FeLV, IFA. However, all available diagnostic tests for FeLV and FIV have some intrinsic level of inaccuracy, making it difficult to resolve discordant results between screening and confirmatory tests with certainty.” (MK)

    See also:
    Westman ME, Malik R, et al. Duration of antibody response following vaccination against feline immunodeficiency virus. J Feline Med Surg.2016 Oct 21. pii: 1098612X16673292. [Epub ahead of print]


    FeLV FIV feline leukemia virus feline immunodeficiency virus diagnostic testing

    More on cat health:

    Winn Feline Foundation Library
    Find us on Facebook
    Follow us on Twitter
    Pin with us on Pinterest
    Join us on Google+

 

Archives

2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007